Laura Loomer has called for Candace Owens to be demonetized, accusing her of profiting from content related to Charlie Kirk’s death and harassing his family. Owens rejected the criticism and responded to Loomer on
Conservative commentators Candace Owens and Laura Loomer have exchanged new words in a public spat that has become another chapter in the ongoing dispute over Charlie Kirk’s death. The latest spat began after Owens shared a new animated video on X detailing the events leading up to Kirk’s death, leading Loomer to accuse the commentator of profiting from controversial claims.
Owens quickly hit back, escalating an already bitter feud that has attracted several prominent conservative figures.
Candace Owens faces criticism from Laura Loomer as cashout request sparks controversy
The latest controversy began after Candace Owens posted an animated video on Channel X discussing her interpretation of the events surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death. Owens has previously shared a number of theories and opinions regarding the shooting, which have generated significant interest and criticism online.
In response to the video, Laura Loomer publicly argued that Owens could no longer monetize this content. When sharing Owens’ post, Loomer wrote:“Candace Owens should be delisted. She should not be allowed to make money from this harassment of Charlie Kirk’s family. It is outrageous that YouTube allows her to make millions of dollars spreading absolute lies and defamation. She is truly crazy and I cannot wait to see the day she is held accountable.”
Loomer’s statements reflect her opinion regarding Owens’ content. These allegations have not been proven as fact.Owens responded directly to Loomer’s criticism, saying that the activist should be “institutionalized (again).” She also claimed that Loomer should not be “allowed to roam freely” and described her as “a danger to the president.”The latest exchange exacerbated an already public feud between commentators, with supporters on both sides chiming in via social media.Public attention also turned toward Owens’ finances amid the controversy. According to Celebrity Net Worth, Candace Owens is worth an estimated $5 million. The estimate has not been independently verified.Owens built her public profile during the 2000s through political commentary on YouTube and other social media platforms. She has also worked with organizations including Turning Point USA and The Daily Wire.
Before entering political media, Owens worked as an intern at Vogue magazine and later joined a private equity firm before launching several business ventures that eventually led to her online career.
Candace Owens’ feud with Ben Shapiro and Andrew Colvitt continues
The feud with Loomer comes as Owens remains embroiled in a separate public dispute with Daily Wire co-founders Ben Shapiro and Andrew Colvett.On Thursday, Owens shared screenshots that she claimed showed Charlie Kirk expressing negative opinions about Shapiro.
In response publicly, Shapiro refused to focus on personal relationships and criticized Owens for her constant commentary about Kirk’s death.books:“Look, here’s the thing: I don’t really care about personal drama. You’ve said over and over that Charlie and I weren’t the best of friends. Maybe you were best friends with Charlie. Maybe you weren’t. I don’t know, and I don’t care. For ten months, you’ve been slandering Charlie’s wife, his friends, and all the people he worked with.
“You are working to exonerate his killer.”
Shapiro continued:“You are spreading conspiratorial poison in order to get money. This is something any decent person should condemn. The fact that so many are unwilling to do so shows the spread of cowardice, stupidity, evil…or all three.”Owens later redirected attention toward Andrew Colvitt, arguing that Shapiro had at least acknowledged the nature of his relationship with Kirk.Published:“Think how positively crazy it is that Ben Shapiro is willing to tell the truth, or at least not deny the truth about his relationship with Charlie but @AndrewColvett is outright lying and seeking to subvert reality. Andrew was Judas Charlie.”This exchange highlights the deep divisions that continue to surround discussions of Charlie Kirk’s death, with prominent conservative voices publicly challenging each other while the public closely follows each new development.
