On Wednesday, Indian billionaire Gautam Adani filed an affidavit asserting that he was not aware of any quid pro quo offer with the US Department of Justice that may have led to the dismissal of the indictment against him and his associates on bribery and fraud charges.
Adani’s statement comes amid a dispute between a US District Court and the Department of Justice regarding the reasons for the latter’s refusal to file a lawsuit against the Adani Group.
In his affidavit, Adani acknowledged that he posted publicly on X in November 2024 about Adani Group’s plans to invest $10 billion and create 15,000 jobs in the United States.
Read also | Was there a quid pro quo to dismiss the case: US judge seeks response from Adani by July 15
“When I made this post, the SEC indictment and complaint had not yet been unsealed and made public, and I was not aware of their existence,” he said.
Adani also admitted that his legal advisor had indicated that his stated intention to invest $10 billion in the United States may have been part of the resolution of the legal charges against him. However, Adani added that the Justice Department had made it clear that promises to invest in the US would not influence their decision to pursue legal charges. This was consistent with statements made by Chief Assistant District Attorney Trent McCotter.
In 2024, the US Department of Justice filed an indictment against Adani alleging that the company engaged in bribery of Indian officials in order to obtain solar contracts, and subsequently engaged in securities fraud by misleading investors about the company’s anti-corruption and anti-bribery efforts. However, in June, the US Department of Justice announced that it would decline to take further legal action against Gautam Adani and his associates. The decision sparked great controversy, with media reports indicating that the Adani Group’s offer to invest in the United States played a major role in the Justice Ministry’s decision.
On June 26, District Judge Garaufis directed the Department of Justice to provide the court with reasons for dismissing the indictment against the defendants after describing the department’s request as “brief, courteous, and decisive.” Although the Justice Department defended its decision to drop the charges — citing little evidence of corruption that Indian authorities found in the case and largely foreign jurisdiction — Garaufis directed Gautam Adani to file an affidavit asserting that he was not aware of any quid pro quo in the decision to drop the charges.
Adani’s lawyer, Robert Giuffra, who has represented US President Donald Trump in the past, also filed a declaration. In it, Gerofra cites a letter he received in May 2026 from Justice Department officials in which he explicitly rejected it
“[T]Part of the joint defense proposal submitted by Gautam Adani, represented by Sullivan & Cromwell, and Sagar R. Adani, represented by Nixon Peabody LLP and Hecker Fink LLP, and Vneet S. Jaain, represented by Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, to resolve, in part, the criminal charges against them. This office flatly rejected a public proposal to invest $10 billion in the United States. Giuffra by Justice Department officials, mentioned in the first announcement.
