After Kejriwal and Sisodia, AAP’s Durgesh Pathak refuses to appear before Justice Kanta Sharma

Anand Kumar
By
Anand Kumar
Anand Kumar
Senior Journalist Editor
Anand Kumar is a Senior Journalist at Global India Broadcast News, covering national affairs, education, and digital media. He focuses on fact-based reporting and in-depth analysis...
- Senior Journalist Editor
3 Min Read
#image_title

New Delhi, Following in the footsteps of leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia, party leader Durgesh Pathak also refused to participate in the proceedings in the ongoing liquor tax case being heard by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court.

After Kejriwal and Sisodia, AAP's Durgesh Pathak refuses to appear before Justice Kanta Sharma
After Kejriwal and Sisodia, AAP’s Durgesh Pathak refuses to appear before Justice Kanta Sharma

In a letter addressed to the judge, Pathak said he agreed with the concerns raised by Kejriwal who alleged a conflict of interest against the judge and added that he would not appear personally or through a legal representative before the court.

Pathak, Sisodia and Kejriwal are parties to the review petition filed by the CBI challenging their discharge in the liquor policy case.

“The present communication relates to the above-mentioned review application, which is currently undergoing subsidiary trial before this court,” Pathak said in the letter.

He said he took the decision after reviewing Kejriwal’s letter dated April 27, in which concerns about bias and impartiality were raised.

“Accordingly, I have also decided not to participate again in the present proceedings, either in person or through legal representation. The mandate, if any, executed in my favor in this matter may be treated as having been duly discharged,” he said.

Pathak said his letter should not be seen as a sign of disrespect for the court and reiterated his faith in the Constitution and the judiciary.

“I take this opportunity to state unequivocally my firm belief in the Constitution of India and in the institutional integrity of the judiciary of this nation,” he said.

He requested that the message be recorded in the record and that the proceedings be conducted in the manner the court deems appropriate and fair.

Meanwhile, Leader of the Opposition in Delhi Assembly Atishi questioned why Justice Sharma did not recuse herself from the case after Kejriwal raised concerns, claiming she had done so in other matters recently.

She asked what was different about this case, which was not considering stepping down.

This article was generated from an automated news feed without any modifications to the text.

Share This Article
Anand Kumar
Senior Journalist Editor
Follow:
Anand Kumar is a Senior Journalist at Global India Broadcast News, covering national affairs, education, and digital media. He focuses on fact-based reporting and in-depth analysis of current events.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *