Candace Owens escalated her feud with J.D. Vance by accusing him of involvement in a deadly strike at a school in Iran, claiming “you guys bombed that school” and “you lied about it.” Her comments followed Vance’s defense of Erica Kirk after the death of Charlie Kirk, deepening divisions within conservative circles as the debate shifted from domestic politics to global implications.
The latest battle within the political right is now open for all to see, and this time it is not hidden. Candace Owens launched a violent attack on J.D. Vance, sparking a deadly international incident in an already tense feud.
What began as a dispute over who should lead the turning point in the United States has now turned into accusations about foreign policy, war decisions, and moral responsibility.Controversy erupted after Vance rejected criticism of Erica Kirk following the death of Charlie Kirk. But Owens didn’t back down. Instead, it broadened the scope of the argument, turning it into a broader condemnation of the political leadership and decision-makers during a tense military conflict involving Iran.
Candace Owens is escalating the feud with an explosive accusation linked to the Iran strike
He watches
Erika doesn’t show up to J.D. Vance. PR lies about why. | Candace episode 325
While speaking on her podcast, Owens gave a specific response that quickly went viral. “I’ve seen some preposterous things over the past few weeks in politics,” she said. “Maybe this should be higher on your list. Like when you guys bombed that school. 150 Iranian schoolgirls were killed, and then you lied about it.” This statement stunned listeners, not only because of its tone but because of its direct reference to a fatal strike in Minab, Iran.
The event I talked about was a missile attack on a school close to a Revolutionary Guard base. Several reports say that investigations indicate that the weapon is a Tomahawk missile, a type of missile used by the US Army. There has been no official confirmation yet, but anonymous sources say the strike may be linked to US military operations in the early stages of the conflict.Owens’ criticisms aren’t just about one thing. She has also questioned the story of Charlie Kirk’s death and publicly questioned Erica Kirk’s leadership.
This has exacerbated divisions among conservatives, exposing fissures that had been forming unnoticed for months.Vance is in a tough spot. His efforts to protect the Allies have now embroiled him in a much larger scandal involving the actions of other countries and the deaths of civilians. Owens knows what to do. She puts herself in the role of critic, not only of the people, but also of the system she was supporting.The repercussions are still happening, but one thing is certain. This is no longer just a fight between two people. It became a key moment in the growing ideological struggle within the movement.
