Candace Owens claims she is “99.9% sure” Tyler Robinson did not shoot Charlie Kirk, citing a lawsuit that says the bullet did not match the alleged weapon. She alleges a federal setup, casts doubt on key evidence, and offers to testify, as Robinson’s legal team seeks more time to review the case.
The controversy surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death has taken another sharp turn, with Candace Owens doubling down on her controversial stance. Speaking on her podcast, Owens said she was “99.9% sure” that Tyler Robinson was not the gunman, pointing to key forensic details that have now entered the public conversation.
According to a recent legal filing, the bullet found during the autopsy could not be matched to the gun allegedly linked to Robinson.This single allegation has already ignited a polarizing situation. Previously, investigators thought Robinson was the prime suspect, but now Owens makes it sound like it’s more complicated. Her comments show that she not only doubts the official story, but rejects it outright. This has led to more questions about how the investigation was handled.
Candace Owens challenges the official narrative and calls for deeper scrutiny
Owens did not hold back when she addressed the new development, insisting that the case against Robinson was deeply flawed. She claimed to have spoken with sources close to the investigation and alleged that federal authorities may have built a misleading case.“There was a tremendous amount of evidence that the feds set this kid up as a kid. Everyone in town, every local sheriff’s department, the SWAT team, they think the feds came in and started lying…
I’m talking to people with close, direct knowledge, and they all believe the feds orchestrated this… Why shouldn’t I testify for the defense? I want to find Charlie’s real killer. “I don’t want to find some random kid to stick this on,” she said.She went further, expressing near certainty about Robinson’s innocence of the shooter.“I feel the exact opposite of what Charlie Kirk’s wife feels. I feel almost certain that Tyler Robinson didn’t shoot… I would say I’m 99.9% sure that Tyler Robinson didn’t shoot Charlie Kirk off the roof himself… I’ll say 0.1% because I don’t know, you should never say 100%… I’m following the facts, and Tyler Robinson didn’t do it. He’s not a lone gunman on the roof, okay?”Owens also questioned other elements of the case, including alleged text messages and forensic findings linked to the weapon.
She said contradictions were still surfacing, and urged critics to either engage with the details or remain silent.While Robinson’s legal team seeks more time to review the evidence before the preliminary hearing, the case now stands at a crossroads. Public opinion is quickly divided, and Owens’ statements ensured that the conversation was far from over.
