Candace Owens is facing new backlash after new allegations were made over the death of Charlie Kirk, suggesting he may have been murdered after refusing to participate in a plot against her. One viral X post accused Owens of provoking the tragedy herself and condemned her statements. Her comments sparked intense debate online, with critics questioning the allegations and supporters continuing to defend her.
Conservative commentator Candace Owens has been hit with a new wave of controversy after a viral social media site accused her of making increasingly explosive claims about the death of Charlie Kirk. The attack comes after Owens questioned in his comments whether Kirk was killed after he refused to participate in a plot against her.
The comments caused a huge uproar online, as supporters and critics clashed over the allegations.
Candace Owens’ Charlie Kirk comments spark viral backlash
The recent backlash intensified after a widely shared post on X criticized Owens for focusing on the discussion surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death. The publication claimed that her latest statements went beyond previous allegations and accused her of provoking the tragedy herself.Read the viral post:“Wow 😮Candace Owens is now saying that Charlie Kirk may have been killed because he refused to kill her‼️Instead of calling things back after the initial hearing, they’re calling things back with ever more outrageous allegations. She refers to herself psychologically in the third person while doing so.Her entire fake “investigation” was about making Charlie’s death about her.She disrespects and belittles everyone else who is grieving his loss including his wife and tries to prove herself as the only one grieving.Now she is trying to convince her fans that Charlie’s assassination was not about him, but it was all about her. He went so far as to say that Charlie was killed because he did not help kill her.Obviously this is ridiculous for several reasons. But in the eyes of her loyal followers, Candace Owens is the most important person on Earth and they literally believe she evades killers on a daily basis like John Wick or an action star.
The post quickly spread across social media, attracting thousands of reactions as users discussed Owens’ statements and criticisms of her.
Candace Owens raises new questions about Charlie Kirk investigation
During her final discussion, Owens expanded on her theory, suggesting there are unanswered questions surrounding conversations that allegedly took place before Charlie Kirk’s death.She said:“I know what my gut told me about the situation from the moment it happened. I know beyond my gut and my dreams. Andrew Colpitt’s statement. It was supposed to be you, wasn’t it? Was it?”“Is it fair to ask if it’s plausible that when Charlie was transferred to the Hamptons, the phone call that no one wanted to answer from BBnet and Yahoo, is it fair to ask the question if it was literally supposed to be me who was supposed to be back on tour with Charlie? Did he say no to killing Candace Owens? And then did he become a liability because he said no? What did Charlie say no to BBnet and Yahoo while Erika was there?”“Again, the people who were present didn’t even want to acknowledge the phone call. I only got acknowledgment that it happened from Erica personally who then said, ‘Oh, he was just following up on a letter Charlie wrote in May. Really?’“At Bill Ackman’s house, did you get BB Net and Yahoo on the phone? And he was like, ‘I got your message.’
I want to talk about that letter from months ago. This looks like an interesting time. I don’t buy it guys. I think this is darker than we can imagine. “I think.”Owens did not provide evidence to support these allegations in the remarks referred to above. As the debate continues across social media, her latest comments have intensified scrutiny of both her ongoing commentary and the broader public conversation surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death.