Reading time: 3 minutes
Rumor has it that Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce are planning to have a wedding before their summer wedding.
Naturally, fans are keen on details. but Who pays for what It’s boring when people have that much money.
Is it true that Taylor can be banned from defaming him in the song after the divorce?
Here’s everything we know so far.
Is there a pre-marriage?
According to reports, Taylor and Travis will have a prenuptial agreement.
Many of their fellow Millennials — even those who don’t have as much as 1% of Travis’ net worth, let alone Taylor’s — choose to have prenuptials because they give them authority over their own property, rather than subjecting them to the whims of how property division is handled under divorce laws wherever they live.
In this case, we’re talking about a man with an 8-figure (and growing) net worth and a billionaire musician.
Apparently, Taylor and Travis aren’t announcing the details of their prenup — nor have they officially confirmed its existence.
However, there is speculation online as to what the document may include And it is forbidden It took off on social media like wildfire.
As of this time, the prenup has not been leaked.
Given that the only people who would likely have access to such a document are Taylor, Travis, and their very well-paid attorneys, we don’t expect that to change.
Speaking of lawyers, Page six I spoke to Sarah Lehto. She does not represent either party, but her law firm deals extensively in marriage and family matters.
“Swift and Kelce may want to include terms that promote confidentiality and privacy,” Lotto noted.
“This may include non-disparagement or non-disclosure terms relating to their relationship,” she added.
The clauses prohibiting her from singing about him seem unacceptable
Most of the time, we think of prenuptial agreements as being about money, property, and perhaps custody of children or pets.
Rumors have suggested that Travis’ attorney, negotiating on his behalf, may include a clause preventing Taylor from singing about their relationship in the event of a breakup.
Lehto warns that there are “some exceptions” to the applicability of certain provisions — even if both partners, at the time, agree to sign.
“In Taylor’s case, she likely wouldn’t want to include provisions prohibiting her from singing about her relationship in the songs,” she said.
“Especially since there is always a lot of speculation about the themes of her songwriting,” Lotto explained.
For many years, nuptials have been used as a plot device on television, most often as a means to the wealthy spouse Evil family To make sure that the protagonist does not steal his wealth despite stealing their son’s heart.
In fact, it’s a powerful way to ensure that both parties agree on who will get, say, an heirloom piece of jewelry or an expensive passion project in the event of a divorce. If the prenup is done the right way, this is it.
The correct way to conclude a prenuptial contract involves having lawyers for both parties. In the case of a wealth disparity, the party with the money pays for both. Solicitors make arrangements based on their clients’ wishes, ensuring that divorce does not mean that either party is vulnerable to theft or poverty.
Most places have laws that allow more or less equitable division for most couples. But why take this chance?
While Taylor and Travis are ironing out the final details before their wedding, the prenup may not be their main concern. In the absence of concrete evidence, Swifties probably shouldn’t worry either.
