No minimum gap between two pregnancies is required to obtain maternity leave: Allahabad HC

Anand Kumar
By
Anand Kumar
Anand Kumar
Senior Journalist Editor
Anand Kumar is a Senior Journalist at Global India Broadcast News, covering national affairs, education, and digital media. He focuses on fact-based reporting and in-depth analysis...
- Senior Journalist Editor
2 Min Read
#image_title

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that the time between two pregnancies should not be above a certain limit to avail maternity leave.

This observation was made by Justice Siddharth Nandan (File photo)
This observation was made by Justice Siddharth Nandan (File photo)

The court held that maternity benefits are subject to the provisions of the Social Security Act of 2020, which does not place any prohibition on determining the time interval between two pregnancies.

This observation was made by Justice Siddharth Nandan who set aside an order of the Department of Medical Education dated January 9, denying maternity leave to the petitioner.

Read also: Can you install safety nets or enclose the balcony like your neighbor did? This is what the Bombay High Court says

The court asked the complainant to submit a new application to obtain maternity leave available to her under the system, and ordered the competent authority in the department to take the appropriate decision in light of the observations made by the court.

The petitioner, Shikha Yadav, is regularly employed as a Registered Nurse/Nursing Officer in the Department of Medical Education, Government of Uttar Pradesh.

She was previously granted 180 days of maternity leave, ending in July 2024. She fell pregnant again with her second child, who was due in January 2026.

Read also: Supreme Council orders maternity leave for all adoptive mothers – regardless of the age of the child

Accordingly, on January 5, I applied for 180 days of maternity leave. However, the request was rejected simply because two years had not passed since she was granted maternity leave.

“Accordingly, it is decided that the provisions of the 2020 Act prevail over any implementing instructions. Accordingly, the said benefits are subject to the provisions of the 2020 Act, which does not place any prohibition, through a schedule between the two loads,” the court noted in its ruling dated July 15.

Share This Article
Anand Kumar
Senior Journalist Editor
Follow:
Anand Kumar is a Senior Journalist at Global India Broadcast News, covering national affairs, education, and digital media. He focuses on fact-based reporting and in-depth analysis of current events.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *